Paolo Lorenzi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Kevin Anderson | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Joao Sousa | 1 | 4 | 5 | Nov 1, 2017 | H2H |
| Pablo Andujar | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 1, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Ruben Bemelmans
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Paolo Lorenzi vs Ruben Bemelmans.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data | Mar 20, 2019* | Q1 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 105 | 181 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,756 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2010 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2016 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 30 | 2012 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2018 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2013 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 43 | 79 | 122 | 35.2% | 57 | 81 | 138 | 41.3% | 5 | 21 | 26 | 19.2% | — | 16 | 32 | 48 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's and 72/72 of Ruben Bemelmans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5/5 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 67.7% | 70.3% | 43.5% | 71.5% | 35.7% | 61.8% | 32.4% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 58.7% | 73.6% | 49.1% | 67.8% | 37.1% | 63.3% | 34.2% |
| 24 | 2006 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 42.5% | 48.6% | 41.7% | 37.5% | 45.3% | 40.0% | 2012 | 9/9 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 60.7% | 68.7% | 48.3% | 56.0% | 49.7% | 60.7% | 35.4% |
| 25 | 2007 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 66.3% | 62.4% | 44.0% | 46.4% | 60.0% | 55.5% | 27.5% | 2013 | 8/8 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 65.0% | 73.1% | 50.6% | 69.6% | 37.6% | 65.5% | 36.9% |
| 27 | 2009 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 54.3% | 64.0% | 28.6% | 33.3% | — | 47.8% | 17.9% | 2015 | 11/11 | 7.3 | 4.5 | 62.0% | 72.0% | 51.2% | 51.1% | 35.3% | 64.2% | 30.8% |
| 28 | 2010 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 61.0% | 64.7% | 44.6% | 56.6% | 27.2% | 56.9% | 33.2% | 2016 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 68.6% | 65.9% | 50.7% | 76.7% | 55.0% | 61.0% | 31.2% |
| 29 | 2011 | 5/5 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 65.2% | 66.1% | 42.6% | 51.9% | 38.0% | 57.9% | 36.6% | 2017 | 10/10 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 65.3% | 68.5% | 53.9% | 53.6% | 31.4% | 63.1% | 32.1% |
| 30 | 2012 | 25/25 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 61.5% | 63.8% | 48.2% | 50.5% | 34.3% | 57.8% | 34.1% | 2018 | 19/19 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 65.4% | 66.5% | 47.0% | 59.4% | 38.4% | 59.9% | 33.4% |
| 31 | 2013 | 37/37 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 57.2% | 67.7% | 49.8% | 52.7% | 36.3% | 60.1% | 36.2% | 2019 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 65.5% | 57.5% | 42.9% | 48.7% | 25.0% | 52.5% | 28.0% |
| 32 | 2014 | 25/25 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 57.6% | 70.1% | 48.9% | 60.1% | 48.5% | 61.1% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 25/25 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 56.5% | 66.9% | 49.3% | 51.8% | 40.9% | 58.6% | 31.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 47/49 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 56.3% | 69.0% | 48.1% | 55.5% | 43.8% | 60.0% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 55/56 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 58.5% | 69.4% | 52.7% | 56.4% | 38.4% | 62.3% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 21/21 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 57.6% | 71.0% | 45.0% | 61.9% | 37.0% | 59.9% | 33.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 16/16 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 60.6% | 71.1% | 51.4% | 67.4% | 45.2% | 63.4% | 30.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5/5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 56.9% | 67.8% | 43.1% | 48.1% | 24.2% | 57.0% | 33.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 61.3% | 61.1% | 32.2% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 49.3% | 25.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 283/286 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 58.3% | 68.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 39.3% | 60.0% | 34.8% | — | 72/72 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 64.2% | 69.0% | 49.1% | 60.0% | 38.6% | 61.9% | 33.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1500 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 1488 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1597 | 122.5 | +0.88 | -0.33 | 0.848 | 47.3% | +32 | — | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.3 | -0.22 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1469 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1634 | 112.3 | +0.10 | -0.35 | 0.931 | 49.4% | — | — | +60 | 46.2% | -0.61 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1504 | 104.3 | +3.27 | -1.79 | 0.732 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.08 | 2012 | 1648 | 118.1 | -1.91 | -0.07 | 0.901 | 48.3% | -38 | — | +135 | 40.0% | -0.64 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | -0.13 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1493 | 97.8 | -0.64 | -3.08 | 0.618 | 43.5% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.04 | 2013 | 1638 | 125.5 | +0.65 | 0.00 | 1.070 | 51.5% | +20 | — | — | 42.9% | +0.29 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.3 | +0.14 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1459 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1628 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 1438 | 104.3 | -4.82 | +0.04 | 0.344 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 2015 | 1695 | 124.5 | -1.03 | -1.29 | 0.860 | 47.4% | +26 | — | — | 27.6% | -1.28 | 0–2 | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.88 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1435 | 112.9 | -3.79 | -3.23 | 0.770 | 45.2% | +6 | +72 | +28 | 20.0% | -1.85 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.7 | -0.07 | 2016 | 1646 | 110.6 | -0.49 | -2.17 | 0.800 | 48.0% | +6 | — | — | 46.2% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.19 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1517 | 125.6 | -0.71 | +1.76 | 0.870 | 47.1% | -1 | — | — | 45.5% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.31 | 2017 | 1694 | 125.7 | -0.20 | -0.85 | 0.870 | 48.1% | -61 | — | +90 | 41.9% | -0.45 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–4 (43%) | 105.5 | -0.25 |
| 30 | 2012 | 1604 | 133.1 | -3.58 | -1.74 | 0.808 | 45.7% | -7 | -40 | -150 | 33.9% | -1.24 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.5 | -0.29 | 2018 | 1686 | 128.9 | -2.91 | -1.28 | 0.833 | 47.2% | -22 | — | +111 | 35.2% | -0.89 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–7 (36%) | 93.4 | -0.61 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1647 | 139.6 | -1.95 | -1.10 | 0.906 | 48.1% | -26 | -59 | -191 | 36.5% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.6 | -0.92 | 2019 | 1590 | 108.5 | -1.92 | +0.26 | 0.590 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.40 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1664 | 133.8 | -1.37 | +1.94 | 1.025 | 50.4% | -26 | +44 | -207 | 42.1% | -0.40 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.3 | +0.70 | 2020 | 1599 | 107.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1615 | 126.4 | -3.80 | -3.71 | 0.748 | 45.0% | +9 | +14 | — | 31.7% | -0.88 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–8 (20%) | 98.7 | +0.18 | 2021 | 1552 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 1793 | 148.1 | -2.03 | -0.06 | 0.925 | 48.8% | -53 | -16 | -398 | 46.8% | -0.22 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–11 (48%) | 108.4 | +1.05 | 2022 | 1518 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 1701 | 139.0 | -1.35 | -1.16 | 0.925 | 48.8% | -33 | +63 | -290 | 45.9% | -0.32 | 8–11 (42%) | 15–16 (48%) | 96.7 | +2.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 1632 | 123.3 | -2.86 | -2.73 | 0.824 | 47.1% | +52 | -8 | -190 | 35.7% | -0.70 | 0–4 (0%) | 5–7 (42%) | 94.8 | +0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 1629 | 124.6 | -0.47 | -3.08 | 0.836 | 47.5% | +77 | -70 | — | 37.0% | -0.67 | 5–3 (63%) | 7–10 (41%) | 101.2 | +1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1537 | 109.2 | -1.98 | -0.85 | 0.778 | 45.2% | +108 | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 1494 | 93.1 | -2.75 | -1.01 | 0.505 | 38.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1824 | 134.2 | -2.16 | -1.27 | 0.869 | 47.5% | -9 | +4 | -201 | 38.6% | -0.71 | 41–46 (47%) | 51–71 (42%) | 98.6 | +2.10 | — | 1756 | 123.9 | -1.13 | -0.82 | 0.871 | 48.0% | -8 | — | +101 | 37.3% | -0.70 | 9–20 (31%) | 15–23 (39%) | 89.1 | -2.74 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ruben Bemelmans
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 18, 2018 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Lucas Pouille | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Joao Sousa | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 21, 2017 | H2H |