H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Paolo Lorenzi vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1

Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3 3-6 0-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #72 6-3 6-3 3-6 0-6 6-3 Paolo Lorenzi #70 Match data May 29, 2013* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
24 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0
34 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1 — — — — — — —
39 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
24 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
34 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.