H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick McEnroe vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1
Patrick McEnroe and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Patrick McEnroe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1995 Paris Masters second round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1995* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Patrick McEnroe | 7-6(8) 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick McEnroe | #1,303 | #28 | 990 | 1,842 | 140 | 164 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick McEnroe | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #494 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #356 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #120 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #36 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #408 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #699 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |