H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paul Annacone vs Leif Shiras H2H: 2-1
Paul Annacone holds a 2–1 lead over Leif Shiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leif Shiras won the 1990 Canada Masters second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leif Shiras | 6-1 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 8-6 | Leif Shiras | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1985* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 6-3 7-6 | Leif Shiras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leif Shiras | #1,118 | #31 | 291 | 1,687 | 71 | 102 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Annacone | Leif Shiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #123 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |