H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Leif Shiras H2H: 2-1

Paul Annacone holds a 2–1 lead over Leif Shiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leif Shiras won the 1990 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-4.

USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leif Shiras #136 6-1 6-4 Paul Annacone #96 Match data Jul 25, 1990* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Paul Annacone #95 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 8-6 Leif Shiras #106 Match data Jun 27, 1990* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Paul Annacone #60 6-3 7-6 Leif Shiras #65 Match data Apr 4, 1985* R32 Chicago ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Leif Shiras #1,118 #31 291 1,687 71 102 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Leif Shiras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1980 0–2 0.0% #482 1,475 0 0
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,454 0 0
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1983 2–2 50.0% #408 1,485 0 0
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,555 0 0
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1985 17–19 47.2% #123 1,646 0 0
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1986 2–5 28.6% #176 1,591 0 0
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1987 4–11 26.7% #157 1,524 0 0
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1988 9–12 42.9% #110 1,586 0 0
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1989 14–16 46.7% #85 1,637 0 0
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3 1990 8–18 30.8% #181 1,553 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Leif Shiras
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1983 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% 22 48 70 31.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 27 27 54 50.0% 19 19 38 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Leif Shiras
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1982 1492 100.7 0.0% -2.50 -0.01
20 1983 1534 110.6 +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) +1.07 1980 1475 97.2 0.0% -4.60 -0.03
21 1984 1584 121.3 -44 +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) +0.74
22 1985 1883 150.0 +31 -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) +0.51 1982 1455 96.8 0.0% -3.33 +0.19
23 1986 1783 144.2 +8 -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) -1.82 1983 1485 108.0 +87 45.5% -0.45 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.08
24 1987 1824 150.8 +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) -3.01 1984 1556 124.7 -88 +124 48.1% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 10–10 (50%) +0.82
25 1988 1785 136.2 -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) -0.06 1985 1646 126.8 -74 +37 48.4% -0.40 7–8 (47%) 11–8 (58%) +0.46
26 1989 1732 134.3 -17 +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) -0.38 1986 1592 109.4 -37 42.1% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) +0.95
27 1990 1651 127.7 +8 +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) -0.79 1987 1525 112.0 -4 -15 +97 35.0% -1.00 0–2 3–4 (43%) +0.97
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 +0.29 1988 1587 128.4 +10 45.3% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) -0.08
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) -0.03 1989 1638 124.3 -38 +26 45.8% -0.18 8–5 (62%) 6–5 (55%) +0.78
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% 0.0% -3.00 0.00 1990 1553 112.8 +19 -37 +91 28.3% -1.65 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) +0.18
Career 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 1687 126.2 -30 -23 +79 42.4% -0.59 29–30 (49%) 38–37 (51%) 104.6 +2.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.