H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Paul Annacone vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 3-1

Paul Annacone holds a 3–1 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1990 San Francisco round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Annacone
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Annacone #51 6-2 6-2 Tim Wilkison #114 Match data Feb 9, 1990* R16 San Francisco ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Wilkison #45 7-5 6-3 6-3 Paul Annacone #15 Match data Dec 1, 1985* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Paul Annacone #27 6-4 5-7 8-6 Tim Wilkison #44 Match data Jun 13, 1985* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Paul Annacone #67 6-3 6-7 6-3 Tim Wilkison #44 Match data Feb 28, 1985* R32 Houston ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Annacone #1,209 #12 430 1,942 160 131 55.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,897 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1983 5–5 50.0% #389 1,533 0 0 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1984 8–9 47.1% #94 1,584 0 0 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1985 45–19 70.3% #13 1,883 0 2 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1986 18–16 52.9% #43 1,782 0 2 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1987 29–20 59.2% #32 1,824 0 2 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,784 0 2 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1989 17–18 48.6% #65 1,732 0 3 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1990 10–17 37.0% #165 1,650 0 3 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 1991 2–3 40.0% #433 1,641 0 3 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 1992 1–4 20.0% #225 1,597 0 3 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 1993 0–1 0.0% #813 1,584 0 3 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1985 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 20 7 27 74.1% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1987 12 10 22 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1989 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 65 124 47.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 39 24 63 61.9% 55 34 89 61.8% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Annacone Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1567 122.3 — — — — -3 +28 -30 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +4.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1660 119.2 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.15
19 1982 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.01 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.77
20 1983 1534 110.6 — — — — +27 -19 +42 50.0% -0.04 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.07 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.50
21 1984 1584 121.3 — — — — -44 — +79 46.8% -0.23 2–1 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.74 1981 1756 139.5 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.41
22 1985 1883 150.0 — — — — +31 — -175 59.4% +0.45 18–5 (78%) 22–16 (58%) — +0.51 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.66
23 1986 1783 144.2 — — — — +8 — -28 51.1% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.82 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.94
24 1987 1824 150.8 — — — — +2 -239 -27 58.2% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.01 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.11
25 1988 1785 136.2 — — — — -6 -161 +14 56.0% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.06 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.48
26 1989 1732 134.3 — — — — -17 — +69 49.5% +0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–14 (22%) — -0.38 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.92
27 1990 1651 127.7 — — — — +8 — +106 44.7% -0.20 3–9 (25%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.79 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.49
28 1991 1641 101.3 -0.79 -2.06 0.687 45.5% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 2–0 — +0.29 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
29 1992 1598 102.6 -0.71 -1.39 0.874 47.9% +11 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.68
30 1993 1585 100.6 -3.42 +1.40 0.666 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
Career — 1942 144.9 -1.04 -1.30 0.788 46.6% +6 -164 -5 53.1% +0.22 55–51 (52%) 72–77 (48%) 97.0 -1.22 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.