H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Paul Capdeville vs Tomas Behrend H2H: 1-0
Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Behrend in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2006 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Paul Capdeville | 6-2 6-0 | Tomas Behrend | Match data |
| May 24, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Tomas Behrend | 6-3 6-2 | Paul Capdeville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Behrend | #1,008 | #74 | 515 | 1,676 | 41 | 72 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Capdeville | Tomas Behrend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #142 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #129 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |