H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Paul Goldstein vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 0-1
Daniel Nestor holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Goldstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Nestor leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Nestor won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-0 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Daniel Nestor | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Goldstein | Daniel Nestor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |