H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1
Paul Haarhuis and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1996 Vienna third round 7-6(10) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1996* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(10) 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1994* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |