H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Paul Haarhuis vs Tom Nijssen H2H: 2-1
Paul Haarhuis holds a 2–1 lead over Tom Nijssen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tom Nijssen won the 1992 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1992* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tom Nijssen | 6-3 6-4 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| May 8, 1991* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Tom Nijssen | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6 6-3 6-3 | Tom Nijssen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tom Nijssen | #827 | #87 | 242 | 1,678 | 39 | 76 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul Haarhuis | Tom Nijssen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #253 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #221 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #235 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #793 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |