H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 2-1
Paul-Henri Mathieu holds a 2–1 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2017 Metz third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 7-5 6-2 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2016* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-1 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2012* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-2 7-5 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |