H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-4

Jeremy Chardy holds a 4–2 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2017 Montpellier fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-4.

FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2017* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeremy Chardy #68 3-6 6-1 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #105 Match data
Jan 8, 2016* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeremy Chardy #31 6-2 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #95 Match data
Jul 23, 2015* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Paul-Henri Mathieu #121 7-5 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #43 Match data
Jun 20, 2012* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Jeremy Chardy #58 7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) Paul-Henri Mathieu #183 Match data
Oct 10, 2010 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Jeremy Chardy #60 2-6 6-2 7-5 Paul-Henri Mathieu #107 Match data
Jul 28, 2010* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Jeremy Chardy #69 6-1 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #95 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Paul-Henri Mathieu #16 6-3 7-5 7-6(1) Jeremy Chardy #108 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul-Henri Mathieu Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1