H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Paul-Henri Mathieu vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-3

Jurgen Melzer holds a 3–1 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 3–0 on clay, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2015 Rotterdam ATP 500 Q2 Q Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #96 6-3 7-6(1) Jurgen Melzer #87 Match data
Apr 13, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jurgen Melzer #27 6-3 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #48 Match data
Mar 22, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #61 6-0 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #29 Match data
Sep 16, 2006* Bucharest ATP 250 SF Clay Jurgen Melzer #67 6-4 (ret.) Paul-Henri Mathieu #54 Match data
Sep 26, 2002* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #94 6-2 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul-Henri Mathieu Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5