H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Paul Mcnamee vs Rod Frawley H2H: 0-1

Rod Frawley holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rod Frawley leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rod Frawley won the 1980 Houston round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paul Mcnamee
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rod Frawley
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rod Frawley #49 6-4 6-4 Paul Mcnamee #47 Match data Apr 11, 1980* R16 Houston ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paul Mcnamee #524 #24 0 1,900 229 217 51.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rod Frawley #483 #43 0 1,814 112 143 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paul Mcnamee Rod Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
18 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,466 0 0 1971 3–5 37.5% — 1,435 0 0
19 1974 0–4 0.0% #318 1,439 0 0 1972 4–6 40.0% — 1,460 0 0
21 1976 2–8 20.0% #174 1,413 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1977 14–18 43.8% #84 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1978 17–24 41.5% #120 1,654 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,478 0 0
24 1979 13–13 50.0% #82 1,692 0 0 1977 3–10 23.1% #207 1,419 0 0
25 1980 45–30 60.0% #40 1,882 0 1 1978 7–15 31.8% #142 1,505 0 0
26 1981 14–11 56.0% #48 1,773 0 1 1979 11–15 42.3% #86 1,583 0 0
27 1982 23–16 59.0% #34 1,827 0 2 1980 29–23 55.8% #44 1,774 0 0
28 1983 38–26 59.4% #35 1,817 0 2 1981 20–24 45.5% #89 1,752 0 0
29 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,726 0 2 1982 22–23 48.9% #87 1,686 0 1
30 1985 13–12 52.0% #48 1,717 0 2 1983 10–14 41.7% #100 1,597 0 1
31 1986 24–19 55.8% #45 1,707 0 2 1984 1–3 25.0% #385 1,576 0 1
32 1987 7–14 33.3% #194 1,604 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1988 3–2 60.0% #456 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paul Mcnamee Rod Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1971 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1972 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 1978 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1979 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
28 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
29 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 38 73 47.9% 103 99 202 51.0% 55 46 101 54.5% 36 34 70 51.4% — 24 35 59 40.7% 17 28 45 37.8% 56 51 107 52.3% 15 29 44 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paul Mcnamee Rod Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1480 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
17 1972 1492 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.19 1970 1448 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.20
18 1973 1466 94.3 — — — — — — +35 20.0% -1.90 1–0 — — +0.37 1971 1435 97.3 — — — — +44 — +62 31.6% -1.11 — 0–2 — +0.93
19 1974 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +20 11.1% -1.45 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.40 1972 1461 104.7 — — — — +33 — +47 45.8% -0.46 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.88
21 1976 1414 106.8 — — — — +83 +98 — 21.7% -1.35 0–1 0–5 (0%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1603 140.6 — — — — — +58 -142 41.3% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1655 130.9 — — — — -177 +90 -227 42.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 100.8 +1.07 1976 1478 107.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–0 — +0.07
24 1979 1693 128.0 — — — — -194 +48 -201 48.4% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.46 1977 1419 104.2 — — — — +46 — +53 28.1% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.55
25 1980 1882 152.0 — — — — -89 -75 -120 60.4% +0.48 6–12 (33%) 21–8 (72%) 105.0 -1.40 1978 1506 130.8 — — — — — +23 +24 33.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 101.3 -0.84
26 1981 1773 132.7 — — — — +11 -5 -30 57.6% +0.47 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 +1.51 1979 1584 123.2 — — — — -108 -25 -1 47.2% -0.06 5–8 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +1.69
27 1982 1827 143.7 — — — — +32 -101 -6 56.3% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 99.6 -0.05 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -97 -151 -51 53.8% +0.06 13–9 (59%) 14–6 (70%) 114.9 -0.59
28 1983 1817 142.6 — — — — -5 -26 +9 53.6% +0.27 13–6 (68%) 16–14 (53%) 102.7 -0.72 1981 1752 129.5 — — — — -133 -186 +83 47.1% -0.15 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 102.3 +0.07
29 1984 1726 140.2 — — — — +31 +84 +45 48.2% -0.05 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 100.8 -1.45 1982 1687 132.2 — — — — -50 -111 +112 47.0% -0.50 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) 109.6 -1.34
30 1985 1717 130.4 — — — — -26 +29 +129 58.6% +0.24 2–9 (18%) 8–2 (80%) 95.8 -0.11 1983 1597 116.8 — — — — +21 0 +66 44.1% -0.39 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 +1.26
31 1986 1707 136.0 — — — — -61 +70 +161 52.8% +0.20 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 102.0 +0.28 1984 1577 104.3 — — — — +18 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — +0.45
32 1987 1605 124.6 — — — — -22 +116 +204 36.5% -0.85 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1646 110.2 — — — — -17 — — 50.0% -0.30 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 — — — — -36 +35 -14 50.8% +0.03 63–64 (50%) 86–77 (53%) 101.8 -0.30 — 1815 131.3 — — — — -67 -74 +48 44.8% -0.43 45–44 (51%) 51–41 (55%) 109.6 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.