H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Pedro Cachin vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 0-2
Juan Ignacio Londero holds a 2–0 lead over Pedro Cachin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Londero leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Londero won the 2020 Cordoba fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 31
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 6-3 6-3 | Pedro Cachin | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2019* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 6-4 7-6(3) | Pedro Cachin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Cachin | #686 | #48 | 937 | 1,744 | 25 | 46 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pedro Cachin | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #363 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #370 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #57 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #70 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #286 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |