H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pedro Martinez vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 0-3
Dusan Lajovic holds a 3–0 lead over Pedro Martinez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2021 Australian Open third round 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Dusan Lajovic | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 6-4 | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2020* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2018* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez | #157 | #36 | 1,385 | 1,845 | 85 | 125 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pedro Martinez | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #85 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #43 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #92 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |