H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pedro Martinez vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-2
Henri Laaksonen holds a 2–0 lead over Pedro Martinez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henri Laaksonen leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-4 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 2-6 6-4 6-4 7-6(1) | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
| May 28, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 6-1 6-0 7-6(4) | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez | #157 | #36 | 1,385 | 1,845 | 85 | 125 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pedro Martinez | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #85 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #43 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #92 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |