H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Pedro Martinez vs Ilya Ivashka H2H: 0-2
Ilya Ivashka holds a 2–0 lead over Pedro Martinez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ilya Ivashka leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ilya Ivashka won the 2022 Barcelona second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2022* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Ilya Ivashka | 6-4 7-6(4) | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2021* | Marbella | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ilya Ivashka | 6-3 7-6(2) | Pedro Martinez | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2018 | Marrakech | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Pedro Martinez | 7-5 7-5 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez | #157 | #36 | 1,385 | 1,845 | 85 | 125 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ilya Ivashka | #791 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,951 | 78 | 83 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pedro Martinez | Ilya Ivashka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #85 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #43 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #48 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #92 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |