H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pedro Rebolledo vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-2
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Pedro Rebolledo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1987 Itaparica third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1987* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-0 | Pedro Rebolledo | Match data |
| May 22, 1982* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-2 | Pedro Rebolledo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Rebolledo | #608 | #36 | 335 | 1,801 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pedro Rebolledo | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #45 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #63 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #129 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1988 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #140 | 1,541 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #210 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #249 | 1,441 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |