H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Pere Riba vs Michael Russell H2H: 0-1
Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Pere Riba in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michael Russell | 6-3 7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(1) | Pere Riba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pere Riba | Michael Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |