H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pete Sampras vs David Wheaton H2H: 8-0

Pete Sampras holds a 8–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 5–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1994 Miami Masters third round 6-0 5-7 6-1.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 1994* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-0 5-7 6-1 David Wheaton #93 Match data
Nov 11, 1993* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #54 Match data
Nov 4, 1993* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-2 David Wheaton #47 Match data
Apr 17, 1993* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-4 David Wheaton #38 Match data
Apr 10, 1993* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-3 3-6 6-4 David Wheaton #47 Match data
Oct 5, 1991* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #7 6-3 4-6 6-4 David Wheaton #13 Match data
Sep 4, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Pete Sampras #6 3-6 6-2 6-2 6-4 David Wheaton #12 Match data
Oct 28, 1990* Stockholm Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Pete Sampras #5 7-6 5-7 6-4 David Wheaton #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pete Sampras David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0
20 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1
22 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2
23 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2
24 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3
26 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3
29 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3
30 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3