H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Peter Feigl vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-0

Peter Feigl holds a 1–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Feigl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Feigl won the 1979 ASB Classic quarterfinal 7-5 3-6 6-1.

AUT Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Feigl #45 7-5 3-6 6-1 Rod Frawley #142 Match data Jan 7, 1979* QF ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Feigl #470 #35 0 1,795 107 113 48.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rod Frawley #483 #43 0 1,814 112 143 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Feigl Rod Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 1–2 33.3% 1,480 0 0
17 1970 0–2 0.0% 1,448 0 0
18 1971 3–5 37.5% 1,435 0 0
19 1972 4–6 40.0% 1,460 0 0
23 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,478 0 0
24 1976 1–3 25.0% #272 1,444 0 0 1977 3–10 23.1% #207 1,419 0 0
25 1977 4–7 36.4% #281 1,487 0 0 1978 7–15 31.8% #142 1,505 0 0
26 1978 22–16 57.9% #45 1,745 0 1 1979 11–15 42.3% #86 1,583 0 0
27 1979 26–22 54.2% #47 1,622 0 2 1980 29–23 55.8% #44 1,774 0 0
28 1980 26–21 55.3% #75 1,720 0 3 1981 20–24 45.5% #89 1,752 0 0
29 1981 9–19 32.1% #93 1,540 0 3 1982 22–23 48.9% #87 1,686 0 1
30 1982 11–11 50.0% 1,574 0 3 1983 10–14 41.7% #100 1,597 0 1
31 1983 6–7 46.2% #137 1,576 0 3 1984 1–3 25.0% #385 1,576 0 1
32 1984 2–4 33.3% #225 1,576 0 3
33 1985 0–2 0.0% #311 1,545 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Feigl Rod Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1970 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1971 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1972 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1978 6 3 9 66.7% 9 9 18 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
28 1980 8 8 16 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
29 1981 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1985 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 37 38 75 49.3% 39 38 77 50.6% 25 24 49 51.0% 6 13 19 31.6% 24 35 59 40.7% 17 28 45 37.8% 56 51 107 52.3% 15 29 44 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Feigl Rod Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1480 94.2 0.0% -3.75 -0.12
17 1970 1448 91.6 0.0% -3.75 +0.20
18 1971 1435 97.3 +44 +62 31.6% -1.11 0–2 +0.93
19 1972 1461 104.7 +33 +47 45.8% -0.46 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) +0.88
23 1975 1482 96.8 0.0% -2.50 +0.27 1976 1478 107.8 50.0% -0.25 1–0 +0.07
24 1976 1445 94.4 36.4% -1.36 0–1 0–1 +1.00 1977 1419 104.2 +46 +53 28.1% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +1.55
25 1977 1487 108.4 +42 +14 40.7% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) +0.49 1978 1506 130.8 +23 +24 33.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) -0.84
26 1978 1745 131.1 -138 -115 -61 58.5% +0.48 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) +2.82 1979 1584 123.2 -108 -25 -1 47.2% -0.06 5–8 (38%) 3–5 (38%) +1.69
27 1979 1623 127.5 -9 +54 -26 55.3% +0.39 8–8 (50%) 7–9 (44%) +5.67 1980 1775 142.4 -97 -151 -51 53.8% +0.06 13–9 (59%) 14–6 (70%) -0.59
28 1980 1720 138.6 -44 -23 -4 52.5% +0.10 13–9 (59%) 7–9 (44%) +0.74 1981 1752 129.5 -133 -186 +83 47.1% -0.15 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) +0.07
29 1981 1541 121.0 +25 +85 38.9% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) +2.29 1982 1687 132.2 -50 -111 +112 47.0% -0.50 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) -1.34
30 1982 1574 120.0 -14 +66 50.0% -0.09 3–1 (75%) 3–3 (50%) +2.51 1983 1597 116.8 +21 0 +66 44.1% -0.39 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) +1.26
31 1983 1577 117.7 -21 +100 52.9% +0.47 0–3 (0%) 0–2 +1.30 1984 1577 104.3 +18 25.0% -2.00 0–2 +0.45
32 1984 1577 113.5 -13 41.7% -0.58 1–0 1–1 -0.04
33 1985 1545 98.9 20.0% -1.40 0–1 +0.14
Career 1795 131.1 -24 +1 -6 50.5% +0.03 41–40 (51%) 28–38 (42%) 99.5 +7.85 1815 131.3 -67 -74 +48 44.8% -0.43 45–44 (51%) 51–41 (55%) 109.6 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.