H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Peter Gojowczyk vs Blaz Kavcic H2H: 1-0
Peter Gojowczyk holds a 1–0 lead over Blaz Kavcic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2018 New York third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2018* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-4 6-2 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Dec 31, 2013* | Doha | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-3 6-3 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Gojowczyk | Blaz Kavcic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |