H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Gojowczyk vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2014 Stuttgart Open first round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Gojowczyk
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 7-5 6-3 Peter Gojowczyk #114 Match data Jul 10, 2014* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Gojowczyk #1,284 #39 1,175 1,884 75 97 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #494 1,515 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #181 1,585 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2013 1–1 50.0% #162 1,609 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2014 7–8 46.7% #79 1,697 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2015 1–3 25.0% #194 1,652 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2016 1–2 33.3% #189 1,678 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2017 14–9 60.9% #60 1,809 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2018 23–25 47.9% #59 1,800 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2019 10–21 32.3% #117 1,672 0 1 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2020 1–3 25.0% #145 1,622 0 1 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2021 13–9 59.1% #86 1,757 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2022 4–14 22.2% #235 1,574 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2014 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2016 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2017 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2019 8 14 22 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2021 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 56 66 122 45.9% 7 17 24 29.2% 12 14 26 46.2% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.3% 47.6% 51.4% 30.0% 50.0% 49.0% 38.7% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 2012 1/1 4.0 4.0 58.5% 56.9% 43.1% 47.1% 44.4% 51.2% 38.5% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2013 2/2 11.5 7.0 53.5% 76.7% 50.7% 63.1% 47.3% 64.8% 39.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2014 15/15 7.4 3.5 57.4% 74.7% 50.2% 69.6% 49.6% 64.1% 35.1% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2015 4/4 6.5 3.0 54.2% 72.3% 48.8% 60.7% 35.4% 61.5% 41.3% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2016 3/3 13.3 1.7 61.2% 75.8% 48.3% 70.8% 37.5% 65.1% 26.5% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2017 23/23 7.6 4.1 54.1% 78.0% 48.0% 53.8% 54.0% 64.1% 37.2% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2018 48/48 6.9 3.3 54.2% 75.4% 49.2% 55.9% 36.1% 63.2% 35.3% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2019 31/31 6.2 4.0 54.0% 70.0% 45.3% 54.6% 40.8% 58.7% 33.9% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2020 4/4 9.3 4.5 57.1% 72.9% 50.7% 50.0% 26.7% 63.2% 33.9% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2021 22/22 7.6 5.1 51.7% 78.0% 48.0% 65.7% 38.3% 63.5% 35.5% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2022 17/18 3.9 4.5 52.9% 65.5% 44.5% 51.3% 38.3% 55.6% 32.1% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 171/172 6.9 4.0 54.2% 73.7% 47.8% 57.5% 41.1% 61.7% 35.1% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Gojowczyk Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1484 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1463 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2010 1516 104.5 +0.44 +1.12 0.759 45.0% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2011 1506 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1585 118.6 -1.08 -5.85 0.788 45.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.02 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2013 1610 112.7 -1.87 +0.62 1.118 51.5% — — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.36 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2014 1697 138.1 +0.13 +0.88 0.980 50.0% +27 -187 -115 47.4% -0.16 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.47 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2015 1653 118.0 +0.17 +0.96 1.073 51.7% +47 — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.08 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2016 1678 121.7 +1.67 -1.23 0.759 46.8% +42 — — 25.0% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — -0.59 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2017 1810 134.4 -0.07 +0.58 1.038 50.9% -21 — -60 55.2% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.94 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2018 1800 151.9 -0.36 -0.06 0.961 49.3% -3 -173 — 46.4% -0.20 11–3 (79%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.51 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2019 1672 144.1 -3.39 -1.36 0.820 46.7% +60 -106 +26 36.7% -0.85 5–7 (42%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2020 1623 120.0 -1.23 -1.08 0.921 48.9% +60 — — 30.8% -0.46 — 1–1 — +0.24 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2021 1758 125.5 -0.63 -0.49 0.973 49.7% +19 — -47 54.1% +0.10 7–2 (78%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.90 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2022 1575 116.4 -5.50 -2.19 0.723 44.1% +37 — +117 16.7% -2.36 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.26 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2023 1567 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1885 137.5 -1.36 -0.43 0.916 48.6% +20 -162 -24 43.5% -0.44 32–21 (60%) 29–37 (44%) 103.1 -0.66 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.