H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Peter Gojowczyk vs Marius Copil H2H: 2-0
Peter Gojowczyk holds a 2–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2017 Metz quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2017* | Metz | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-2 6-4 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Peter Gojowczyk | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| May 29, 2017 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q3 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Gojowczyk | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |