H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Peter Gojowczyk vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-2
Matthew Ebden holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-2 6-3 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2017* | Newport | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 6-3 6-3 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Gojowczyk | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |