H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Peter Gojowczyk vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 0-1
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2017 Antwerp third round 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2017* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2017 | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | Q2 | Grass | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-4 7-6(4) | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2014 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-3 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2012* | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q3 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-2 6-4 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Peter Gojowczyk | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |