H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Peter Wessels vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-1

Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2007 Stockholm Open first round 6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Peter Wessels
NED Age 48 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #69 6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(6) Peter Wessels #200 Match data Oct 10, 2007* R32 Stockholm Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Peter Wessels #987 #72 586 1,714 43 58 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Peter Wessels Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 1996 0–3 0.0% #369 1,475 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 1997 0–2 0.0% #321 1,467 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 1998 1–2 33.3% #112 1,479 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 1999 12–15 44.4% #108 1,591 0 0 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 2000 7–5 58.3% #150 1,641 0 1 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2001 11–11 50.0% #110 1,604 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2002 0–1 0.0% #465 1,564 0 1 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2003 0–1 0.0% #203 1,557 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2004 0–2 0.0% #89 1,526 0 1 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2005 8–13 38.1% #144 1,563 0 1 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2006 0–1 0.0% #401 1,527 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2007 4–2 66.7% #163 1,613 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Peter Wessels Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1998 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 23 32 55 41.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 14 32 56.2% 0 5 5 0.0% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 95/101 of Peter Wessels's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Peter Wessels Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 1996 3/3 8.3 3.0 61.5% 62.5% 32.4% 55.7% 61.1% 51.3% 34.7% 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 1997 2/2 10.0 2.0 60.1% 73.6% 38.5% 58.5% 0.0% 59.6% 17.6% 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 1998 1/3 12.0 4.0 61.3% 66.2% 53.5% 66.7% 100.0% 61.3% 21.1% 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 1999 27/27 9.5 4.6 61.2% 75.2% 49.1% 61.8% 39.6% 65.1% 33.9% 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 2000 11/12 10.4 2.3 66.2% 73.9% 57.2% 52.5% 42.9% 68.6% 31.6% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2001 19/22 9.0 3.5 59.8% 74.1% 53.4% 63.5% 51.5% 65.9% 34.5% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2002 1/1 4.0 9.0 57.5% 67.4% 44.1% 72.7% 50.0% 57.5% 30.6% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2003 1/1 4.0 4.0 47.4% 59.3% 33.3% 64.3% 50.0% 45.6% 31.1% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2004 2/2 4.0 3.0 67.0% 63.1% 28.0% 43.7% 25.0% 51.4% 34.9% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2005 21/21 8.0 2.5 65.9% 72.9% 49.9% 59.9% 30.0% 64.9% 32.2% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 55.4% 54.8% 28.0% 40.0% 60.0% 42.9% 37.7% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2007 6/6 12.0 2.7 65.6% 83.8% 56.3% 79.2% 46.6% 74.5% 34.8% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 95/101 9.0 3.4 62.7% 73.6% 49.9% 61.0% 41.3% 64.8% 33.0% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Peter Wessels Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 1996 1475 102.0 -0.08 -2.50 0.713 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.11 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 1997 1467 105.2 -1.39 +2.61 0.437 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.38 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 1998 1480 109.1 +1.72 +5.01 0.543 44.9% — — — 42.9% -0.28 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.10 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 1999 1591 118.8 +2.37 -3.00 0.971 49.5% +12 — -32 45.3% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.84 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2000 1641 122.2 +2.17 -2.35 1.006 50.2% -75 — +51 54.2% +0.17 2–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.27 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2001 1605 120.2 +2.47 -1.70 1.013 50.4% -16 — +82 50.0% +0.06 2–3 (40%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.81 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2002 1564 101.9 +1.56 -0.70 0.721 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2003 1557 102.3 -0.62 +1.54 0.572 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2004 1527 100.6 -2.69 -2.56 0.718 43.4% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2005 1564 122.2 +1.32 -2.48 0.918 48.4% -13 -82 — 44.4% -0.24 1–4 (20%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.36 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2006 1528 99.1 -2.36 -1.00 0.660 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2007 1613 113.3 +3.68 -0.01 1.362 53.2% — — +120 71.4% +0.93 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.38 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2008 1574 105.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2009 1554 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1714 121.4 +1.86 -2.04 0.937 49.0% -10 -82 +56 44.8% -0.29 11–17 (39%) 27–31 (47%) 99.5 +2.81 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.