H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Petr Korda vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 1-3

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 3–1 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-2.

CZE Age 58 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 26, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #20 6-2 6-2 Petr Korda #43 Match data
Feb 11, 1995* Dubai ATP 250 SF Hard Andrea Gaudenzi #24 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Petr Korda #20 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #34 6-2 5-7 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 Petr Korda #12 Match data
Feb 3, 1994* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Petr Korda #14 4-6 7-5 6-2 Andrea Gaudenzi #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petr Korda #1,382 #2 3,499 2,110 378 238 61.4% 1 1 1 0 7 10
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petr Korda Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,489 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
19 1987 2–1 66.7% #87 1,527 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1988 6–13 31.6% #188 1,530 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0
21 1989 13–8 61.9% #59 1,690 0 0 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0
22 1990 23–26 46.9% #38 1,729 0 0 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0
23 1991 44–22 66.7% #9 1,922 0 2 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 1992 57–28 67.1% #7 1,940 0 5 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1
25 1993 50–23 68.5% #12 1,954 0 6 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1
26 1994 33–20 62.3% #18 1,838 0 6 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1
27 1995 25–23 52.1% #41 1,801 0 6 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3
28 1996 36–17 67.9% #24 1,904 0 7 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 1997 52–24 68.4% #13 1,976 0 8 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 1998 31–20 60.8% #13 1,777 1 10
31 1999 6–12 33.3% #170 1,674 1 10