H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Petr Korda vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-1
Petr Korda and Hicham Arazi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay, while Petr Korda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1998 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-2 6-4 | Petr Korda | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Petr Korda | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petr Korda | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |