H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Petr Korda vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-4

Tim Henman holds a 4–2 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1999 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petr Korda
CZE Age 58 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #7 6-3 6-4 Petr Korda #74 Match data
Jul 3, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Tim Henman #18 6-3 6-4 6-2 Petr Korda #3 Match data
Mar 21, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #20 6-4 6-4 Petr Korda #2 Match data
Jan 10, 1998* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Petr Korda #13 7-5 4-6 6-4 Tim Henman #17 Match data
Feb 28, 1997* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Petr Korda #29 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #14 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tim Henman #90 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 Petr Korda #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petr Korda #1,382 #2 3,499 2,110 378 238 61.4% 1 1 1 0 7 10
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petr Korda Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 2–1 66.7% #87 1,527 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1988 6–13 31.6% #188 1,530 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1989 13–8 61.9% #59 1,690 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1990 23–26 46.9% #38 1,729 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1991 44–22 66.7% #9 1,922 0 2 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1992 57–28 67.1% #7 1,940 0 5 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1993 50–23 68.5% #12 1,954 0 6 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 1994 33–20 62.3% #18 1,838 0 6 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 1995 25–23 52.1% #41 1,801 0 6 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 1996 36–17 67.9% #24 1,904 0 7 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 1997 52–24 68.4% #13 1,976 0 8 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 1998 31–20 60.8% #13 1,777 1 10 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 1999 6–12 33.3% #170 1,674 1 10 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11