H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Phil Dent vs Jaime Pinto Bravo H2H: 0-1

Jaime Pinto Bravo holds a 1–0 lead over Phil Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Pinto Bravo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Pinto Bravo won the 1968 Palermo round of 32 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 76 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
CHI Age 87 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Pinto Bravo 6-2 6-3 Phil Dent Match data Apr 18, 1968* R32 Palermo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Phil Dent — #17 0 1,958 414 344 54.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jaime Pinto Bravo — — — 1,624 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Phil Dent Jaime Pinto Bravo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 21–15 58.3% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1969 24–22 52.2% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1970 19–15 55.9% — 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1971 28–33 45.9% — 1,672 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1972 5–22 18.5% — 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1973 38–31 55.1% #49 1,762 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1974 29–19 60.4% #41 1,828 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1975 41–26 61.2% #33 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1976 28–22 56.0% #37 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1977 59–29 67.0% #20 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1978 24–24 50.0% #87 1,744 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1979 27–22 55.1% #50 1,854 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1980 28–19 59.6% #34 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1981 26–21 55.3% #65 1,753 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1982 17–19 47.2% #57 1,727 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1983 0–5 0.0% — 1,639 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Phil Dent Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1968 — — — — 11 9 20 55.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1970 3 1 4 75.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1971 15 10 25 60.0% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1972 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 12 15 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 10 8 18 55.6% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 30 10 40 75.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1968 — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1970 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1981 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
32 1982 4 7 11 36.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
33 1983 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 3 10 13 23.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 83 77 160 51.9% 115 96 211 54.5% 155 85 240 64.6% 61 86 147 41.5% — 5 16 21 23.8% 49 73 122 40.2% 4 12 16 25.0% 1 13 14 7.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Phil Dent Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1588 114.0 — — — — — -36 +43 53.1% +0.25 4–1 (80%) — — +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 1578 111.6 — — — — +5 -22 +22 49.2% -0.10 9–4 (69%) — — +2.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1970 1652 119.6 — — — — -10 -70 +2 53.8% +0.08 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1971 1673 131.5 — — — — +49 -174 +55 47.3% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.2 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1972 1610 141.4 — — — — +4 -89 +77 29.7% -1.05 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 92.7 -3.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 1763 138.7 — — — — +16 -135 -89 54.9% +0.38 9–13 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 100.7 -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 1828 137.7 — — — — -82 -197 +78 60.2% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) 95.9 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 1862 142.9 — — — — -95 -70 +80 56.9% +0.26 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 108.4 -3.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1976 1853 153.9 — — — — -3 -76 +101 56.3% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.5 -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1977 1852 146.0 — — — — -65 +78 +46 62.0% +0.61 18–9 (67%) 18–8 (69%) 109.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 1745 138.5 — — — — -25 +115 +104 48.4% -0.31 12–9 (57%) 11–5 (69%) 104.3 -1.73 1968 1540 107.1 — — — — — -12 — 51.2% -0.02 2–1 (67%) — — -0.50
29 1979 1855 142.1 — — — — -193 -68 +147 55.3% +0.20 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 100.8 -0.69 1969 1512 111.4 — — — — — -22 +34 30.0% -0.87 3–2 (60%) — — -0.46
30 1980 1846 138.9 — — — — -171 -94 +169 55.5% +0.29 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) 102.8 +1.00 1970 1487 107.3 — — — — — -34 — 20.0% -1.50 0–1 — — -0.43
31 1981 1753 130.9 — — — — -82 — +160 54.2% +0.21 9–11 (45%) 13–10 (57%) 98.1 +2.03 1971 1492 119.5 — — — — +50 -36 — 32.4% -1.15 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
32 1982 1728 146.8 — — — — -77 +60 +164 48.2% +0.09 3–8 (27%) 5–5 (50%) 95.0 -2.25 1972 1557 121.2 — — — — — +17 -81 40.0% -0.67 5–2 (71%) 1–1 — -0.65
33 1983 1639 101.1 — — — — -58 — — 15.4% -2.54 0–2 — — +0.07 1973 1555 117.6 — — — — -74 +56 — 38.4% -0.85 5–11 (31%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +1.24
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1446 108.2 — — — — -71 +96 -30 28.6% -1.62 1–9 (10%) 3–5 (38%) 93.1 +1.80
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1506 124.0 — — — — — +61 — 43.5% -0.33 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +2.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1556 127.6 — — — — — +43 — 41.9% -0.48 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — -0.04
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1602 118.1 — — — — — +23 — 40.9% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1583 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1595 100.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 — — +0.22
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1576 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.21
Career — 1958 142.7 — — — — -46 -32 +79 53.4% +0.14 120–110 (52%) 115–90 (56%) 105.2 -1.08 — 1625 122.7 — — — — -61 +33 -13 37.6% -0.82 24–37 (39%) 10–15 (40%) 96.8 +2.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.