H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Phil Dent vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 2-0
Phil Dent holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Phil Dent leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Phil Dent won the 1975 Washington Indoor Wct third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1975* | Washington Indoor Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Phil Dent | 6-4 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1971* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Phil Dent | 6-2 6-4 6-7 4-6 6-1 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Dent | #726 | #17 | 0 | 1,953 | 418 | 351 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Phil Dent | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 24–22 | 52.2% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 28–33 | 45.9% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–22 | 18.5% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 38–31 | 55.1% | #49 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #41 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #33 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #37 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #22 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1978 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #50 | 1,853 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1980 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #34 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1981 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #65 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1982 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |