H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-1

Philipp Kohlschreiber and Ruben Bemelmans are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 1–0 on grass, while Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2013 Vienna fourth round 4-6 6-1 7-6(0).

GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2013* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Ruben Bemelmans #176 4-6 6-1 7-6(0) Philipp Kohlschreiber #24 Match data
Jun 10, 2010* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Philipp Kohlschreiber #35 7-6(2) 6-7(10) 6-4 Ruben Bemelmans #199 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,755 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Kohlschreiber Ruben Bemelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0
23 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0
24 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,649 0 0
25 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,638 0 0
26 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,644 0 0
29 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,693 0 0
30 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0
31 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0
32 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7