H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Philipp Petzschner vs Jan Hajek H2H: 1-0
Philipp Petzschner holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Hajek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Petzschner won the 2011 Zagreb third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2011* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Petzschner | 6-3 6-3 | Jan Hajek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |