H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Philipp Petzschner vs Karol Beck H2H: 0-1
Karol Beck holds a 1–0 lead over Philipp Petzschner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karol Beck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karol Beck won the 2012 Rotterdam third round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Karol Beck | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Philipp Petzschner | 6-4 6-3 | Karol Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Karol Beck | #1,630 | #36 | 932 | 1,789 | 60 | 109 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Karol Beck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #66 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #44 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #57 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #103 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #101 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #141 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |