H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Philipp Petzschner vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 4-0

Philipp Petzschner holds a 4–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Philipp Petzschner leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Petzschner won the 2012 London Olympics first round 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Philipp Petzschner
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Philipp Petzschner #94 7-6 6-1 Lukas Lacko #55 Match data Jul 30, 2012* R64 London Olympics Olympics Grass
Philipp Petzschner #41 6-4 6-3 Lukas Lacko #75 Match data Jun 12, 2010* QF Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Philipp Petzschner #70 6-1 1-6 6-1 Lukas Lacko #66 Match data Feb 20, 2010* QF Memphis ATP 500 Hard
Philipp Petzschner #84 6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 Lukas Lacko #72 Match data Feb 6, 2010* QF Zagreb ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Philipp Petzschner #1,212 #35 1,232 1,847 86 105 45.0% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Philipp Petzschner Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 2–3 40.0% #367 1,516 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2004 1–1 50.0% #399 1,526 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2005 0–2 0.0% #301 1,505 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2007 1–1 50.0% #185 1,561 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2008 10–9 52.6% #66 1,736 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2009 15–25 37.5% #80 1,697 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2010 21–19 52.5% #57 1,760 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2011 21–22 48.8% #63 1,763 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2012 11–16 40.7% #115 1,698 0 1 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2013 3–5 37.5% #206 1,654 0 1 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2014 1–2 33.3% #421 1,653 0 1 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Philipp Petzschner Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2004 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2008 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2009 9 16 25 36.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2010 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2012 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 51 61 112 45.5% 14 25 39 35.9% 21 19 40 52.5% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 188/191 of Philipp Petzschner's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Philipp Petzschner Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 5/5 7.0 4.4 49.2% 79.2% 47.6% 61.6% 22.1% 63.6% 28.5% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2004 2/2 7.0 2.5 58.1% 59.2% 54.4% 41.4% 41.7% 57.7% 33.2% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2005 2/2 3.5 2.0 54.0% 64.8% 61.3% 64.6% 15.5% 63.0% 34.5% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2007 2/2 16.0 5.5 53.9% 75.2% 49.8% 50.5% 29.9% 63.4% 36.6% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2008 19/19 6.6 3.8 55.4% 75.0% 52.5% 53.7% 34.3% 64.6% 37.2% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2009 40/40 8.0 4.0 54.3% 73.5% 46.1% 58.1% 44.4% 61.1% 32.5% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2010 40/40 7.5 2.5 55.9% 73.8% 48.7% 58.7% 42.2% 62.7% 36.7% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2011 43/43 7.3 3.0 54.3% 75.2% 52.5% 59.2% 37.6% 64.7% 36.1% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2012 24/27 7.1 2.4 60.3% 72.1% 48.8% 53.6% 46.1% 62.9% 35.4% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2013 8/8 4.5 2.5 58.6% 69.1% 50.2% 42.7% 36.9% 61.0% 36.9% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2014 3/3 2.7 4.0 54.9% 75.6% 43.0% 62.0% 27.8% 60.9% 33.2% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 188/191 7.2 3.1 55.6% 73.7% 49.6% 56.7% 39.9% 62.9% 35.2% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Philipp Petzschner Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1517 106.4 +0.99 -1.83 0.781 45.5% +35 — — 55.6% -0.67 0–1 2–0 — +0.08 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2004 1526 102.9 -1.72 +0.68 0.784 46.0% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.10 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2005 1506 97.1 -2.68 -0.82 0.933 47.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2007 1562 113.3 -1.03 +2.89 1.001 49.3% — — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 — — +0.08 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2008 1737 124.8 +0.66 -0.08 1.051 50.3% +2 -228 -124 48.9% -0.26 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.39 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2009 1697 141.6 -1.23 -2.33 0.836 47.2% -18 -153 -10 41.7% -0.66 7–10 (41%) 16–8 (67%) — -1.29 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2010 1761 142.7 -0.25 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -39 -166 +41 50.5% +0.09 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.05 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2011 1764 141.8 +1.01 -0.25 1.024 50.4% -35 -153 +86 50.0% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.80 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2012 1698 130.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.955 49.4% -26 — +191 45.5% -0.09 1–4 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.15 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2013 1654 120.4 -1.50 +0.42 0.947 48.5% +41 — — 41.2% -1.12 0–1 0–1 — +0.81 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2014 1653 110.6 -1.72 -1.30 0.851 46.7% — — — 37.5% -1.75 1–1 2–0 — -0.19 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2015 1603 109.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2018 1582 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1847 138.0 -0.24 -0.53 0.950 49.1% -21 -169 +61 46.6% -0.24 34–35 (49%) 50–39 (56%) 108.0 -1.26 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.