H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Philipp Petzschner vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-1
Philipp Petzschner holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Memphis fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2011* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Petzschner | 6-2 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Philipp Petzschner | 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Philipp Petzschner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |