Philipp Petzschner
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |
| Janko Tipsarevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukas Lacko | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Florian Mayer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 28, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Philipp Petzschner holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Memphis round of 16 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Philipp Petzschner | Match data | Feb 24, 2012* | R16 | Memphis | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Philipp Petzschner | 6-2 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data | Oct 20, 2011* | R32 | Stockholm Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Philipp Petzschner | 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data | Jun 24, 2010* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 86 | 105 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #115 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #72 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2003 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2009 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 51 | 61 | 112 | 45.5% | 14 | 25 | 39 | 35.9% | 21 | 19 | 40 | 52.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | 62 | 95 | 34.7% | 36 | 45 | 81 | 44.4% | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 188/191 of Philipp Petzschner's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2003 | 5/5 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 49.2% | 79.2% | 47.6% | 61.6% | 22.1% | 63.6% | 28.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2/2 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 58.1% | 59.2% | 54.4% | 41.4% | 41.7% | 57.7% | 33.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 54.0% | 64.8% | 61.3% | 64.6% | 15.5% | 63.0% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 73.6% | 41.1% | 52.8% | 16.7% | 61.9% | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 2/2 | 16.0 | 5.5 | 53.9% | 75.2% | 49.8% | 50.5% | 29.9% | 63.4% | 36.6% | 2005 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 83.0% | 47.7% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 49.1% | 27.5% |
| 24 | 2008 | 19/19 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 55.4% | 75.0% | 52.5% | 53.7% | 34.3% | 64.6% | 37.2% | 2006 | 10/10 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 61.6% | 62.6% | 44.2% | 52.3% | 33.1% | 55.4% | 33.8% |
| 25 | 2009 | 40/40 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 73.5% | 46.1% | 58.1% | 44.4% | 61.1% | 32.5% | 2007 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 60.8% | 58.5% | 40.6% | 21.7% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 41.3% |
| 26 | 2010 | 40/40 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 73.8% | 48.7% | 58.7% | 42.2% | 62.7% | 36.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 43/43 | 7.3 | 3.0 | 54.3% | 75.2% | 52.5% | 59.2% | 37.6% | 64.7% | 36.1% | 2009 | 18/18 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 70.6% | 49.6% | 57.5% | 37.8% | 63.0% | 36.1% |
| 28 | 2012 | 24/27 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 60.3% | 72.1% | 48.8% | 53.6% | 46.1% | 62.9% | 35.4% | 2010 | 38/39 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 62.5% | 66.5% | 45.5% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 58.7% | 37.0% |
| 29 | 2013 | 8/8 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 69.1% | 50.2% | 42.7% | 36.9% | 61.0% | 36.9% | 2011 | 34/34 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 61.4% | 70.1% | 46.4% | 56.6% | 52.7% | 60.9% | 37.0% |
| 30 | 2014 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 54.9% | 75.6% | 43.0% | 62.0% | 27.8% | 60.9% | 33.2% | 2012 | 47/48 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 61.4% | 69.3% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 39.7% | 61.2% | 37.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 26/27 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 62.6% | 67.8% | 45.0% | 52.0% | 41.4% | 59.2% | 37.1% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17/17 | 7.6 | 5.7 | 59.9% | 69.1% | 48.8% | 57.0% | 33.4% | 60.8% | 32.4% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/3 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 65.8% | 68.0% | 54.5% | 69.4% | 14.3% | 63.4% | 31.7% |
| Career | — | 188/191 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 55.6% | 73.7% | 49.6% | 56.7% | 39.9% | 62.9% | 35.2% | — | 199/202 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 61.9% | 68.2% | 46.9% | 55.2% | 41.9% | 60.1% | 36.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Philipp Petzschner | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1517 | 106.4 | +0.99 | -1.83 | 0.781 | 45.5% | +35 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1526 | 102.9 | -1.72 | +0.68 | 0.784 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 1506 | 97.1 | -2.68 | -0.82 | 0.933 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1514 | 104.6 | +0.89 | +0.01 | 1.051 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1562 | 113.3 | -1.03 | +2.89 | 1.001 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.08 | 2005 | 1484 | 98.6 | +2.62 | -3.59 | 0.539 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1737 | 124.8 | +0.66 | -0.08 | 1.051 | 50.3% | +2 | -228 | -124 | 48.9% | -0.26 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.39 | 2006 | 1552 | 111.5 | -2.84 | -0.81 | 0.759 | 45.1% | +43 | — | — | 36.7% | -1.37 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1697 | 141.6 | -1.23 | -2.33 | 0.836 | 47.2% | -18 | -153 | -10 | 41.7% | -0.66 | 7–10 (41%) | 16–8 (67%) | — | -1.29 | 2007 | 1486 | 99.1 | -3.22 | -0.28 | 0.831 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1761 | 142.7 | -0.25 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -39 | -166 | +41 | 50.5% | +0.09 | 11–6 (65%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.05 | 2008 | 1507 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 1764 | 141.8 | +1.01 | -0.25 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -35 | -153 | +86 | 50.0% | +0.14 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | -1.80 | 2009 | 1730 | 130.5 | -0.39 | +0.74 | 0.974 | 49.4% | -21 | -13 | — | 51.2% | -0.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -0.34 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1698 | 130.8 | -0.80 | -0.33 | 0.955 | 49.4% | -26 | — | +191 | 45.5% | -0.09 | 1–4 (20%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +0.15 | 2010 | 1653 | 134.9 | -3.52 | +0.17 | 0.895 | 48.1% | +52 | -19 | -182 | 41.7% | -0.46 | 2–7 (22%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | +0.09 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1654 | 120.4 | -1.50 | +0.42 | 0.947 | 48.5% | +41 | — | — | 41.2% | -1.12 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | 2011 | 1819 | 141.7 | -1.34 | -0.12 | 0.947 | 49.2% | -93 | -18 | -86 | 49.0% | -0.07 | 10–7 (59%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | +0.47 |
| 30 | 2014 | 1653 | 110.6 | -1.72 | -1.30 | 0.851 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.75 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.19 | 2012 | 1716 | 137.7 | -1.80 | +0.15 | 0.952 | 49.5% | -31 | +48 | -3 | 45.8% | -0.14 | 6–8 (43%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | +0.63 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1603 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1667 | 126.1 | -3.42 | -0.55 | 0.908 | 48.2% | -63 | +74 | +118 | 41.1% | -0.52 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.16 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1670 | 124.3 | -1.32 | -2.59 | 0.827 | 47.1% | -101 | +15 | +100 | 40.8% | -0.73 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.27 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1698 | 119.7 | -2.83 | +2.52 | 0.866 | 48.0% | -40 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.72 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.21 |
| 34 | 2018 | 1582 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1654 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1847 | 138.0 | -0.24 | -0.53 | 0.950 | 49.1% | -21 | -169 | +61 | 46.6% | -0.24 | 34–35 (49%) | 50–39 (56%) | 108.0 | -1.26 | — | 1871 | 133.5 | -2.13 | -0.20 | 0.909 | 48.4% | -30 | +7 | +8 | 43.9% | -0.40 | 26–45 (37%) | 39–39 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.69 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |
| Janko Tipsarevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukas Lacko | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Florian Mayer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 28, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 1, 2014 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 30, 2013 | H2H |
| Nicolas Almagro | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 18, 2012 | H2H |
| Igor Andreev | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Potito Starace | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 15, 2012 | H2H |