H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Guido Pella H2H: 1-0
Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a 1–0 lead over Guido Pella in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pierre-Hugues Herbert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pierre-Hugues Herbert won the 2016 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 6-3 6-4 | Guido Pella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Guido Pella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |