H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Marius Copil H2H: 0-1

Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Pierre-Hugues Herbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2014 Stockholm Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pierre-Hugues Herbert
France Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #80 6-3 3-6 6-0 Marius Copil #114 Match data Apr 16, 2017* Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Marius Copil #198 6-3 4-6 6-3 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #91 Match data Oct 17, 2016 Q2 Q Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Marius Copil #181 6-4 6-3 Pierre-Hugues Herbert #124 Match data Oct 17, 2014* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pierre-Hugues Herbert #286 #36 1,168 1,936 105 137 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Marius Copil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0
22 2013 1–2 33.3% #151 1,540 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0
23 2014 5–11 31.2% #111 1,707 0 0 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0
24 2015 7–6 53.8% #167 1,748 0 0 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0
25 2016 7–12 36.8% #78 1,802 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0
26 2017 10–19 34.5% #81 1,749 0 0 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0
27 2018 24–21 53.3% #55 1,821 0 0 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0
28 2019 22–24 47.8% #65 1,783 0 0 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0
29 2020 10–10 50.0% #83 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2021 9–14 39.1% #110 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2022 2–3 40.0% #305 1,666 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0
32 2023 3–1 75.0% #237 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2024 1–3 25.0% #148 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 4–7 36.4% #155 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–4 0.0% #286 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Marius Copil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2015 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2016 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2017 6 12 18 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 18 17 35 51.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2019 9 14 23 39.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 89 160 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 15 18 33 45.5% — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Marius Copil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5%
22 2013 3/3 6.7 3.3 59.8% 71.0% 49.1% 62.9% 31.1% 62.1% 35.6% 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3%
23 2014 16/16 11.2 4.0 51.7% 77.3% 54.4% 56.8% 27.9% 65.9% 29.7% 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6%
24 2015 13/13 12.6 4.5 55.3% 76.7% 52.3% 65.1% 42.0% 65.9% 33.6% 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6%
25 2016 19/19 10.6 5.1 56.7% 75.7% 51.7% 49.5% 46.9% 65.1% 31.6% 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0%
26 2017 29/29 9.4 4.2 60.8% 74.0% 49.7% 56.1% 31.9% 64.4% 31.4% 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5%
27 2018 45/45 8.3 4.0 61.6% 73.9% 51.5% 65.4% 44.3% 65.1% 34.3% 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3%
28 2019 46/46 6.5 3.2 60.5% 72.7% 51.3% 59.9% 36.4% 64.1% 33.0% 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3%
29 2020 20/20 7.6 4.1 57.1% 74.4% 46.6% 51.1% 37.1% 62.7% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 23/23 9.1 5.6 56.4% 73.5% 55.6% 62.4% 53.5% 65.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 5/5 5.2 3.2 60.0% 74.4% 51.1% 38.1% 33.7% 64.4% 34.5% 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3%
32 2023 4/4 11.8 2.3 69.9% 75.3% 46.0% 76.0% 23.4% 66.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 4/4 12.5 5.0 66.7% 76.2% 40.4% 50.7% 35.7% 64.2% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 11/11 8.3 9.1 54.7% 75.6% 44.8% 58.7% 48.4% 61.7% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 4/4 6.8 7.8 64.5% 68.8% 34.0% 40.0% 45.3% 56.5% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 242/242 8.7 4.4 59.0% 74.2% 50.6% 58.6% 39.9% 64.4% 33.4% — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pierre-Hugues Herbert Marius Copil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1484 95.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
19 2010 1483 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
20 2011 1457 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
21 2012 1456 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32
22 2013 1540 117.0 +2.61 +1.21 0.937 49.2% +27 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 0–1 — -0.17 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
23 2014 1708 124.4 +0.36 -3.15 0.870 48.0% -10 — -9 33.3% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.74 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33
24 2015 1749 131.2 +1.79 -0.60 0.986 50.2% 0 — — 50.0% +0.15 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.22 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66
25 2016 1803 141.0 +1.37 -2.72 0.908 48.8% -29 -202 +9 44.6% -0.27 0–4 (0%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.69 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
26 2017 1749 137.9 -0.18 -2.61 0.881 47.7% +11 -100 -2 38.4% -1.01 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.71 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06
27 2018 1821 144.1 +0.80 -1.62 0.982 50.1% +7 -83 -72 50.8% -0.07 10–9 (53%) 16–16 (50%) — -0.13 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13
28 2019 1783 152.8 +0.32 -1.39 0.919 49.2% -18 +31 +16 45.5% -0.29 6–4 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -4.04 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18
29 2020 1792 141.7 -0.43 +0.98 1.002 50.2% -18 +7 — 52.7% +0.11 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.17 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1692 141.3 +2.26 -0.73 1.048 51.0% +50 +49 — 46.9% 0.00 2–9 (18%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.56 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1666 114.9 -0.42 -1.31 0.969 49.4% +82 — — 45.5% -0.73 0–1 2–0 — +0.03 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
32 2023 1654 105.4 +0.04 -1.23 1.066 50.4% +78 — — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1561 110.2 -0.06 -0.94 0.819 47.2% — — — 27.3% -1.09 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.14 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1576 114.6 -0.79 -2.33 0.827 47.5% +55 -19 — 36.7% -0.47 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1545 105.4 -3.13 -0.80 0.810 45.3% — — — 30.8% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 138.7 +0.53 -1.49 0.940 49.2% +6 -25 -8 45.0% -0.30 35–49 (42%) 61–77 (44%) 91.9 -2.83 — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.