H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Marius Copil H2H: 0-1
Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Pierre-Hugues Herbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2014 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2017* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | Marius Copil | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2016 | Antwerp | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2014* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-4 6-3 | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |