H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Pierre-Hugues Herbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2014 Metz third round 6-4 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2014* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |