H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 2-0
Pierre-Hugues Herbert holds a 2–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pierre-Hugues Herbert leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pierre-Hugues Herbert won the 2020 Paris Masters second round 2-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2021* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 6-3 6-2 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2020* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2020* | Cologne 2 | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre-Hugues Herbert | #247 | #36 | 1,168 | 1,935 | 105 | 136 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Tennys Sandgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #167 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #55 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #237 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |