H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Potito Starace vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 0-1
Filippo Volandri holds a 1–0 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filippo Volandri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filippo Volandri won the 2006 Doha fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2006* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Filippo Volandri | 6-4 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Filippo Volandri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |