H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Potito Starace vs Pere Riba H2H: 1-2
Pere Riba holds a 2–1 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pere Riba leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Pere Riba won the 2011 Bucharest third round 6-1 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2011* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pere Riba | 6-1 3-2 (ret.) | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Pere Riba | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Potito Starace | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2010* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Potito Starace | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Pere Riba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potito Starace | #943 | #27 | 1,138 | 1,789 | 147 | 188 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Potito Starace | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #72 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #62 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |