H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Quentin Halys vs Guido Pella H2H: 0-1
Guido Pella holds a 1–0 lead over Quentin Halys in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guido Pella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2023 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-7(7) 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Guido Pella | 6-4 6-7(7) 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Quentin Halys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Quentin Halys | Guido Pella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |