H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2004 Kitzbuhel second round 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2004* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(3) | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radek Stepanek | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |