H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Radek Stepanek vs Kevin Kim H2H: 2-0

Radek Stepanek holds a 2–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2009 Memphis round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Radek Stepanek #19 6-4 6-2 Kevin Kim #105 Match data Feb 19, 2009* R32 Memphis ATP 500 Hard
Radek Stepanek #14 6-1 6-3 Kevin Kim #83 Match data Oct 7, 2005* R16 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,037 366 285 56.2% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radek Stepanek Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,841 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,853 0 2 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2008 31–24 56.4% #27 1,836 0 2 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,012 0 4 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,863 0 4 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,881 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2012 21–20 51.2% #31 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,827 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,767 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,877 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radek Stepanek Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 18 15 33 54.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2006 13 7 20 65.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2007 20 12 32 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2008 21 17 38 55.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2010 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2011 20 15 35 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 9 8 17 52.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 7 10 17 41.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 169 378 55.3% 91 71 162 56.2% 43 30 73 58.9% 23 15 38 60.5% — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 639/651 of Radek Stepanek's and 122/122 of Kevin Kim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radek Stepanek Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1998 1/1 5.0 1.0 54.7% 62.1% 33.3% 42.9% 20.0% 49.1% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 6/6 6.0 2.0 58.3% 69.3% 42.6% 59.9% 38.6% 58.3% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1/1 5.0 3.0 65.2% 68.9% 33.3% 70.0% 20.0% 56.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 26/31 7.3 3.2 59.4% 72.9% 49.2% 60.7% 44.8% 63.2% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 46/46 7.4 3.1 60.7% 72.8% 50.1% 55.3% 41.9% 63.5% 37.3% 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 2004 51/51 6.4 3.6 62.2% 72.6% 49.8% 55.7% 43.6% 64.0% 36.2% 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2005 71/71 7.5 3.0 64.4% 73.7% 51.7% 66.5% 39.3% 65.9% 37.1% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2006 45/45 8.7 3.2 63.9% 74.4% 54.9% 62.6% 43.0% 67.3% 38.3% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2007 47/48 7.0 2.0 62.1% 75.9% 56.8% 64.8% 46.2% 68.7% 37.6% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2008 53/55 7.3 3.2 63.6% 76.1% 52.4% 64.1% 47.8% 67.4% 36.7% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2009 63/63 6.3 3.2 61.4% 73.3% 50.5% 57.0% 41.7% 64.4% 39.9% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2010 31/32 5.0 3.0 64.0% 70.1% 51.8% 59.2% 38.2% 64.0% 37.0% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2011 54/54 3.6 2.8 60.8% 70.7% 51.7% 58.1% 41.9% 63.3% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 40/41 4.8 3.1 61.6% 71.5% 53.7% 63.1% 39.4% 64.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 29/30 4.7 2.9 63.5% 69.3% 49.0% 55.4% 45.7% 61.9% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 33/33 5.8 3.4 60.3% 72.8% 51.4% 60.2% 37.4% 64.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 17/17 4.6 3.6 62.7% 71.8% 50.4% 64.2% 50.0% 63.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 20/21 6.0 3.9 59.5% 72.2% 49.9% 60.8% 40.2% 63.4% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 5/5 4.4 5.4 54.7% 70.3% 43.6% 69.0% 34.3% 58.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 639/651 6.3 3.1 62.1% 72.9% 51.6% 60.6% 42.3% 64.8% 37.8% — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radek Stepanek Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
19 1998 1489 99.4 -0.50 -3.84 0.604 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1502 117.9 +0.16 -0.75 0.920 48.5% +39 +31 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.17 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 2000 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 2001 1464 98.0 -2.55 -0.96 0.652 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.07 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2002 1659 130.9 +1.72 -2.01 0.956 49.4% -95 -3 -24 53.9% +0.12 4–4 (50%) 10–4 (71%) — +0.45 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2003 1716 137.5 +1.55 +0.11 1.021 49.7% -50 -11 +20 53.4% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.79 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2004 1790 136.2 +1.09 -0.10 1.005 50.1% -38 -63 -52 51.9% +0.08 12–7 (63%) 13–12 (52%) — -2.23 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2005 1841 145.4 +2.95 +0.75 1.088 51.5% 0 -67 -37 57.7% +0.53 20–11 (65%) 19–16 (54%) — +2.05 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98
27 2006 1866 141.5 +4.32 +1.02 1.172 52.4% -33 -19 +10 62.2% +0.76 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.10 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13
28 2007 1854 148.1 +4.89 +1.48 1.201 52.8% +27 -67 -43 52.2% +0.39 7–9 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.67 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68
29 2008 1837 157.2 +3.56 +1.09 1.126 51.6% -30 +96 +2 58.7% +0.80 10–12 (45%) 15–16 (48%) — +0.45 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2009 2013 160.7 +1.73 +3.84 1.123 51.8% +19 -107 -91 61.9% +0.57 17–6 (74%) 12–3 (80%) — +1.40 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72
31 2010 1864 146.3 +0.65 +0.89 1.026 50.5% -3 — — 47.9% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.90 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2011 1881 156.8 +0.65 +2.39 1.052 50.8% +8 -12 +29 55.6% +0.40 9–6 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.99 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 1923 159.1 +1.92 +3.04 1.109 51.8% +7 -124 +4 51.5% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.03 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 1828 147.9 -0.61 +2.71 1.032 50.4% +61 -128 +76 48.6% +0.17 4–3 (57%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.65 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 1802 154.6 +0.71 +2.99 1.070 51.0% -25 -46 +189 50.6% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 1767 133.6 -0.58 +2.17 1.047 50.8% -15 +42 — 43.6% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1877 143.0 +0.67 +1.85 1.035 50.5% -41 -15 +22 48.1% +0.02 3–3 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1908 130.4 -0.95 +0.89 0.968 49.7% -21 — — 50.0% -0.20 — 1–0 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2038 154.7 +1.94 +1.47 1.073 51.1% -9 -39 +15 54.4% +0.34 120–97 (55%) 139–135 (51%) 103.0 -0.75 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.