H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Radek Stepanek vs Kevin Kim H2H: 2-0
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2009 Memphis third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 6-2 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2005* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-1 6-3 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radek Stepanek | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |