H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Radek Stepanek vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2013 Vienna Open second round 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Radek Stepanek #46 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(5) Lukas Lacko #73 Match data Oct 18, 2013* R16 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,037 366 285 56.2% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radek Stepanek Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,841 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,853 0 2 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2008 31–24 56.4% #27 1,836 0 2 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,012 0 4 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,863 0 4 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,881 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2012 21–20 51.2% #31 1,922 0 5 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,827 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,767 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,877 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radek Stepanek Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2005 18 15 33 54.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2006 13 7 20 65.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2007 20 12 32 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2008 21 17 38 55.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2010 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 20 15 35 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2013 9 8 17 52.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 7 10 17 41.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 169 378 55.3% 91 71 162 56.2% 43 30 73 58.9% 23 15 38 60.5% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 639/651 of Radek Stepanek's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radek Stepanek Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1998 1/1 5.0 1.0 54.7% 62.1% 33.3% 42.9% 20.0% 49.1% 30.8% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 1999 6/6 6.0 2.0 58.3% 69.3% 42.6% 59.9% 38.6% 58.3% 38.4% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2001 1/1 5.0 3.0 65.2% 68.9% 33.3% 70.0% 20.0% 56.5% 28.3% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2002 26/31 7.3 3.2 59.4% 72.9% 49.2% 60.7% 44.8% 63.2% 35.2% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2003 46/46 7.4 3.1 60.7% 72.8% 50.1% 55.3% 41.9% 63.5% 37.3% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2004 51/51 6.4 3.6 62.2% 72.6% 49.8% 55.7% 43.6% 64.0% 36.2% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2005 71/71 7.5 3.0 64.4% 73.7% 51.7% 66.5% 39.3% 65.9% 37.1% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2006 45/45 8.7 3.2 63.9% 74.4% 54.9% 62.6% 43.0% 67.3% 38.3% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2007 47/48 7.0 2.0 62.1% 75.9% 56.8% 64.8% 46.2% 68.7% 37.6% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2008 53/55 7.3 3.2 63.6% 76.1% 52.4% 64.1% 47.8% 67.4% 36.7% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2009 63/63 6.3 3.2 61.4% 73.3% 50.5% 57.0% 41.7% 64.4% 39.9% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2010 31/32 5.0 3.0 64.0% 70.1% 51.8% 59.2% 38.2% 64.0% 37.0% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2011 54/54 3.6 2.8 60.8% 70.7% 51.7% 58.1% 41.9% 63.3% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 40/41 4.8 3.1 61.6% 71.5% 53.7% 63.1% 39.4% 64.5% 39.4% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2013 29/30 4.7 2.9 63.5% 69.3% 49.0% 55.4% 45.7% 61.9% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 33/33 5.8 3.4 60.3% 72.8% 51.4% 60.2% 37.4% 64.5% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 17/17 4.6 3.6 62.7% 71.8% 50.4% 64.2% 50.0% 63.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 20/21 6.0 3.9 59.5% 72.2% 49.9% 60.8% 40.2% 63.4% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 5/5 4.4 5.4 54.7% 70.3% 43.6% 69.0% 34.3% 58.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 639/651 6.3 3.1 62.1% 72.9% 51.6% 60.6% 42.3% 64.8% 37.8% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radek Stepanek Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1489 99.4 -0.50 -3.84 0.604 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 1999 1502 117.9 +0.16 -0.75 0.920 48.5% +39 +31 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.17 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2000 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2001 1464 98.0 -2.55 -0.96 0.652 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.07 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2002 1659 130.9 +1.72 -2.01 0.956 49.4% -95 -3 -24 53.9% +0.12 4–4 (50%) 10–4 (71%) — +0.45 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2003 1716 137.5 +1.55 +0.11 1.021 49.7% -50 -11 +20 53.4% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.79 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2004 1790 136.2 +1.09 -0.10 1.005 50.1% -38 -63 -52 51.9% +0.08 12–7 (63%) 13–12 (52%) — -2.23 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2005 1841 145.4 +2.95 +0.75 1.088 51.5% 0 -67 -37 57.7% +0.53 20–11 (65%) 19–16 (54%) — +2.05 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2006 1866 141.5 +4.32 +1.02 1.172 52.4% -33 -19 +10 62.2% +0.76 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.10 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2007 1854 148.1 +4.89 +1.48 1.201 52.8% +27 -67 -43 52.2% +0.39 7–9 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.67 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2008 1837 157.2 +3.56 +1.09 1.126 51.6% -30 +96 +2 58.7% +0.80 10–12 (45%) 15–16 (48%) — +0.45 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2009 2013 160.7 +1.73 +3.84 1.123 51.8% +19 -107 -91 61.9% +0.57 17–6 (74%) 12–3 (80%) — +1.40 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2010 1864 146.3 +0.65 +0.89 1.026 50.5% -3 — — 47.9% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.90 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2011 1881 156.8 +0.65 +2.39 1.052 50.8% +8 -12 +29 55.6% +0.40 9–6 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.99 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 1923 159.1 +1.92 +3.04 1.109 51.8% +7 -124 +4 51.5% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.03 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2013 1828 147.9 -0.61 +2.71 1.032 50.4% +61 -128 +76 48.6% +0.17 4–3 (57%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.65 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 1802 154.6 +0.71 +2.99 1.070 51.0% -25 -46 +189 50.6% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 1767 133.6 -0.58 +2.17 1.047 50.8% -15 +42 — 43.6% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1877 143.0 +0.67 +1.85 1.035 50.5% -41 -15 +22 48.1% +0.02 3–3 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1908 130.4 -0.95 +0.89 0.968 49.7% -21 — — 50.0% -0.20 — 1–0 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2038 154.7 +1.94 +1.47 1.073 51.1% -9 -39 +15 54.4% +0.34 120–97 (55%) 139–135 (51%) 103.0 -0.75 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.