H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Radu Albot vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 0-1

Diego Schwartzman holds a 1–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2019 Cincinnati Open second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radu Albot
Moldova Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Schwartzman #24 6-4 6-2 Radu Albot #39 Match data Aug 14, 2019* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radu Albot #497 #39 1,137 1,896 90 140 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radu Albot Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2014 1–4 20.0% #168 1,606 0 0 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #121 1,614 0 0 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 2016 4–11 26.7% #97 1,675 0 0 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2017 9–17 34.6% #87 1,670 0 0 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2018 12–23 34.3% #98 1,714 0 0 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 2019 31–26 54.4% #46 1,816 0 1 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 2020 7–10 41.2% #93 1,732 0 1 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 2021 6–15 28.6% #123 1,570 0 1 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 2022 9–10 47.4% #103 1,662 0 1 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4
33 2023 7–12 36.8% #131 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2024 3–7 30.0% #163 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #434 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radu Albot Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 14 20 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2019 23 17 40 57.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2021 5 8 13 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 86 147 41.5% 21 38 59 35.6% 8 16 24 33.3% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/230 of Radu Albot's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radu Albot Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2014 5/5 1.6 3.4 65.9% 63.1% 42.1% 63.5% 39.3% 56.6% 38.8% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2015 5/5 1.0 3.0 65.1% 59.1% 37.6% 42.6% 38.4% 51.7% 39.0% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 2016 13/15 2.2 3.2 66.2% 61.1% 48.7% 55.0% 46.8% 56.9% 36.0% 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2017 26/26 3.0 2.9 62.8% 66.2% 50.6% 48.3% 43.6% 60.2% 35.7% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2018 35/35 2.4 3.3 65.2% 65.9% 49.5% 55.6% 39.4% 60.0% 36.4% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 2019 57/57 3.4 2.6 63.0% 67.2% 53.0% 55.2% 43.3% 61.9% 37.8% 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 2020 16/17 1.7 3.1 61.8% 64.9% 49.3% 53.7% 39.5% 59.2% 37.4% 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 2021 21/21 3.0 3.9 63.0% 64.4% 45.7% 51.9% 34.6% 57.2% 35.3% 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 2022 19/19 3.4 3.1 63.6% 69.1% 49.8% 60.8% 36.8% 62.4% 37.0% 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
33 2023 19/19 2.3 2.9 62.8% 65.5% 46.6% 55.4% 34.5% 58.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 10/10 3.2 3.7 64.5% 66.3% 50.0% 51.2% 38.0% 60.7% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.0% 51.0% 54.0% 20.0% 33.0% 52.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/230 2.7 3.1 63.6% 65.7% 49.5% 54.1% 40.1% 59.8% 36.7% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radu Albot Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2011 1497 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2012 1466 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75
23 2013 1438 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35
24 2014 1607 122.1 -2.31 -0.70 0.894 47.8% — +40 — 35.7% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.21 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94
25 2015 1614 123.1 -2.79 +0.03 0.807 45.7% +3 — — 30.8% -1.54 0–1 1–0 — -0.35 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44
26 2016 1676 124.8 -4.13 -0.78 0.836 47.2% -39 -7 — 34.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.16 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19
27 2017 1670 129.9 -2.66 -1.11 0.896 48.1% -17 -38 -35 40.3% -0.61 2–5 (29%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.49 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52
28 2018 1714 135.8 -3.43 +1.06 0.911 48.2% -18 -113 -36 37.5% -0.58 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.10 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93
29 2019 1817 153.0 -1.61 +1.82 0.993 50.0% +29 -125 -190 52.1% -0.06 10–10 (50%) 18–10 (64%) — -0.81 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52
30 2020 1732 124.6 -1.95 +0.59 0.918 47.9% +30 -87 — 42.9% -0.50 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.67 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53
31 2021 1571 116.4 -4.13 -1.09 0.825 46.4% +75 +15 — 33.3% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.63 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 2022 1663 128.4 -1.24 +0.24 0.983 49.7% +11 — +47 50.0% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
33 2023 1648 124.0 -3.20 -0.54 0.864 47.6% -30 +19 — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1674 122.8 -1.89 +1.37 0.932 48.4% -6 — — 33.3% -0.70 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1577 102.9 -0.87 -4.65 0.667 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 133.7 -2.56 +0.39 0.914 48.4% +10 -59 -48 41.3% -0.55 34–41 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 102.4 -0.15 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.