H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Radu Albot vs Jack Sock H2H: 0-3

Jack Sock holds a 3–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jack Sock leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2022 Newport round of 32 6-1 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Radu Albot
Moldova Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jack Sock #100 6-1 7-6(2) Radu Albot #110 Match data Jul 14, 2022* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Jack Sock 3-6 6-3 7-6(2) Radu Albot #51 Match data Feb 20, 2020* R32 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Jack Sock #21 6-4 7-6(2) Radu Albot #89 Match data Feb 23, 2017* R32 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radu Albot #497 #39 1,137 1,896 90 140 39.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,105 177 148 54.5% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radu Albot Jack Sock
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,696 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2016 36–19 65.5% #23 2,024 0 1
24 2014 1–4 20.0% #168 1,606 0 0 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,986 0 4
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #121 1,614 0 0 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,715 0 4
26 2016 4–11 26.7% #97 1,675 0 0 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4
27 2017 9–17 34.6% #87 1,670 0 0 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4
28 2018 12–23 34.3% #98 1,714 0 0 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4
29 2019 31–26 54.4% #46 1,816 0 1 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,747 0 4
30 2020 7–10 41.2% #93 1,732 0 1 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4
31 2021 6–15 28.6% #123 1,570 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 9–10 47.4% #103 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 7–12 36.8% #131 1,648 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2024 3–7 30.0% #163 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #434 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radu Albot Jack Sock
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 21 12 33 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 26 13 39 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 33 15 48 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2015 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 7 14 21 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 6 14 20 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2021 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2019 23 17 40 57.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2020 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 5 8 13 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 86 147 41.5% 21 38 59 35.6% 8 16 24 33.3% — 129 109 238 54.2% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 13 30 56.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/230 of Radu Albot's and 322/325 of Jack Sock's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Radu Albot Jack Sock
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 7.0 55.1% 63.3% 57.5% 54.5% 66.7% 60.7% 30.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 8.7 4.0 54.7% 65.2% 50.8% 31.0% 29.1% 59.4% 35.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 12/12 9.5 5.9 55.2% 71.3% 52.4% 69.4% 30.1% 63.0% 34.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/23 7.0 5.2 55.0% 75.0% 51.5% 60.4% 55.3% 64.5% 34.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 47/47 6.4 3.9 58.3% 76.5% 54.5% 68.2% 49.3% 67.5% 34.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 50/51 6.1 5.2 56.9% 75.9% 53.0% 63.5% 47.5% 66.2% 35.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 54/55 6.7 3.7 58.3% 75.8% 55.2% 67.7% 37.5% 67.2% 36.5%
24 2014 5/5 1.6 3.4 65.9% 63.1% 42.1% 63.5% 39.3% 56.6% 38.8% 2017 57/58 6.8 4.0 59.7% 72.8% 52.4% 56.9% 40.8% 64.7% 36.3%
25 2015 5/5 1.0 3.0 65.1% 59.1% 37.6% 42.6% 38.4% 51.7% 39.0% 2018 30/30 6.3 4.3 61.2% 73.0% 51.0% 58.6% 36.7% 64.5% 34.7%
26 2016 13/15 2.2 3.2 66.2% 61.1% 48.7% 55.0% 46.8% 56.9% 36.0% 2019 4/4 10.8 4.5 63.0% 70.4% 49.7% 44.3% 62.5% 62.7% 28.6%
27 2017 26/26 3.0 2.9 62.8% 66.2% 50.6% 48.3% 43.6% 60.2% 35.7% 2020 7/7 5.6 4.7 60.6% 69.1% 51.8% 48.5% 45.2% 62.2% 35.7%
28 2018 35/35 2.4 3.3 65.2% 65.9% 49.5% 55.6% 39.4% 60.0% 36.4% 2021 11/11 8.5 3.8 59.3% 75.1% 47.0% 61.1% 46.0% 63.8% 36.2%
29 2019 57/57 3.4 2.6 63.0% 67.2% 53.0% 55.2% 43.3% 61.9% 37.8% 2022 17/17 6.2 3.7 64.8% 70.1% 48.6% 58.5% 40.9% 62.8% 35.7%
30 2020 16/17 1.7 3.1 61.8% 64.9% 49.3% 53.7% 39.5% 59.2% 37.4% 2023 6/6 6.0 5.5 56.9% 72.8% 47.5% 70.6% 31.7% 61.8% 33.8%
31 2021 21/21 3.0 3.9 63.0% 64.4% 45.7% 51.9% 34.6% 57.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 19/19 3.4 3.1 63.6% 69.1% 49.8% 60.8% 36.8% 62.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 19/19 2.3 2.9 62.8% 65.5% 46.6% 55.4% 34.5% 58.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 10/10 3.2 3.7 64.5% 66.3% 50.0% 51.2% 38.0% 60.7% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.0% 51.0% 54.0% 20.0% 33.0% 52.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/230 2.7 3.1 63.6% 65.7% 49.5% 54.1% 40.1% 59.8% 36.7% — 322/325 6.7 4.3 58.6% 74.2% 52.6% 62.1% 43.2% 65.3% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radu Albot Jack Sock
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1458 94.9 -2.51 -1.84 0.774 45.3% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.07
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1490 107.8 -1.04 +0.61 0.863 46.9% +9 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.29
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1602 120.6 -0.99 -1.79 0.926 48.9% +18 — — 43.3% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.03
20 2010 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1696 140.5 +0.25 -0.25 0.983 50.1% -7 -46 — 47.2% -0.25 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.01
21 2011 1497 104.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1894 151.5 +2.13 +0.15 1.067 51.5% -36 -152 -188 56.5% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.38
22 2012 1466 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1985 166.3 +2.00 +0.71 1.042 51.0% -7 -65 -218 61.0% +0.61 11–5 (69%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.24
23 2013 1438 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2024 160.1 +2.86 +1.03 1.112 51.3% +3 -111 -222 60.1% +0.45 13–6 (68%) 17–13 (57%) — +1.63
24 2014 1607 122.1 -2.31 -0.70 0.894 47.8% — +40 — 35.7% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.21 2017 1987 164.2 +1.24 +1.03 1.028 50.3% +39 -114 — 58.8% +0.23 18–9 (67%) 22–9 (71%) — +1.66
25 2015 1614 123.1 -2.79 +0.03 0.807 45.7% +3 — — 30.8% -1.54 0–1 1–0 — -0.35 2018 1716 137.8 +0.06 -1.43 0.976 49.6% +74 +66 — 43.4% -0.47 1–13 (7%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.03
26 2016 1676 124.8 -4.13 -0.78 0.836 47.2% -39 -7 — 34.9% -0.81 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.16 2019 1634 108.9 -0.40 -1.52 0.767 45.8% +41 — — 9.1% -1.91 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.14
27 2017 1670 129.9 -2.66 -1.11 0.896 48.1% -17 -38 -35 40.3% -0.61 2–5 (29%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.49 2020 1726 125.6 -1.79 -0.20 0.944 48.3% -53 — — 40.9% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22
28 2018 1714 135.8 -3.43 +1.06 0.911 48.2% -18 -113 -36 37.5% -0.58 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.10 2021 1776 133.5 -0.49 -0.16 1.000 50.1% -49 — -56 53.6% +0.36 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.96
29 2019 1817 153.0 -1.61 +1.82 0.993 50.0% +29 -125 -190 52.1% -0.06 10–10 (50%) 18–10 (64%) — -0.81 2022 1747 131.6 -0.95 -0.13 0.959 49.5% -34 — +59 52.3% -0.23 1–6 (14%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.19
30 2020 1732 124.6 -1.95 +0.59 0.918 47.9% +30 -87 — 42.9% -0.50 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.67 2023 1717 116.0 +0.17 -0.95 0.884 48.4% -15 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24
31 2021 1571 116.4 -4.13 -1.09 0.825 46.4% +75 +15 — 33.3% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1663 128.4 -1.24 +0.24 0.983 49.7% +11 — +47 50.0% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1648 124.0 -3.20 -0.54 0.864 47.6% -30 +19 — 33.3% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1674 122.8 -1.89 +1.37 0.932 48.4% -6 — — 33.3% -0.70 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1577 102.9 -0.87 -4.65 0.667 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 133.7 -2.56 +0.39 0.914 48.4% +10 -59 -48 41.3% -0.55 34–41 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 102.4 -0.15 — 2105 157.4 +1.18 +0.22 1.020 50.4% +5 -78 -125 53.7% +0.11 57–60 (49%) 90–78 (54%) 100.6 +1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.