H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Radu Albot vs Jozef Kovalik H2H: 1-1
Radu Albot and Jozef Kovalik are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radu Albot leads 1–0 on clay, while Jozef Kovalik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2018 Kitzbuhel third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Radu Albot | 6-1 6-3 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2018* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jozef Kovalik | 6-3 6-3 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Radu Albot | 4-6 7-6(0) 6-1 6-3 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radu Albot | Jozef Kovalik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |